Hate Mail Makes Me Feel Funny In My Pants: The Fucktards Strike Back!
I get a fair amount of hate mail. Usually, it's from someone like this fucktard who, inexplicably, landed on my blog and decided I was causing him curious offense. Most of the time I don't bother to post my hate mail here, opting instead to forward it to my siblings so we can all giggle about it. It's sort of a Goldberg sibling ritual -- we all send each other our hate mail, which is then followed up by a phone call where we reiterate how funny the hate mail is, and then we pause to wonder if the person sending us the hate mail will later threaten to kill us -- which happens more often than we appreciate, really -- and then, well, then we talk about what we just bought at Trader Joe's and the relative merits of Neil Diamond songs and such.
Weirdly, sometimes I hear about hate mail from a third party. For instance, a couple of months ago a man emailed me to say that the makers of C'mere Deer and their "celebrity" spokesman were really pissed off about a blog post I made a couple of years ago regarding their product, which made me positively gleeful. It's not often I can piss off the Michael Jordan of bass fishermen, after all.
This month, however, it was as if the fucktards had a convention and determined that enough was enough: They were going to let me know exactly how they felt about being fucktards. Most notable of these was a letter I received from a contestant on the Amazing Race who wanted to let me know that despite my insistence on calling her entire family fucktards who tried to use Jesus to their competitive advantage, I'd seen things incorrectly. "I never tried to exploit Jesus and hope that it never made you feel badly toward God," the contestant wrote. "God does love you...and me....despite all of our sinful ways."
It's always nice to know God loves me, despite, you know, my people ratting his son out. But I object to being called a sinner, since, you know, I'm not a "sinner" owing to my lack of belief in any organized religion. (Culturally Jewish, to answer your next question, which means I rock the kugel and but also had Canadian bacon on my pizza this evening and believe when I die I go to an enormous petri dish in the sky.) I might be a "criminal" in a given situation, but I don't think I'm a sinner.
People whose names have appeared in my Parade rants typically react poorly to finding their names here. What usually happens is they'll send me an email saying, "How dare you!" followed by a series of complaints about being called such a cruel name as fucktard and then a demand to have their name removed or else face a lawsuit. Of course there's nothing actionable in my putting people's names in this blog, particularly since I'm quoting them, and people tend to think mentioning lawsuits is a good way to get people to act, but I come from a family of lawyers, so I'm not terribly afraid of people's internet lawyers. I think the main thing is that people tend to be mortified by discovering that they are, in fact, fucktards. It can be a daunting realization. This month, though, I learned that outing people as fucktards is actually bad for the kids. Here's an email in full from a person who didn't like me calling her a fucktard, though, I assure you, her question was one of those that makes me literally fear that Communism might have been the way to go:
Sometime ago you called me horrible names. As an ex-police officer I allowed it to just run of my back, having heard much the same in the streets from those I had arrested.
However, a few moments ago my 16 yr old son came me to saying one of his friends showed him what you wrote about his Mother. I just wanted to know why your column needed to be so vindictive.
As a student I believed in debate and discussion... not personal attack. I would ask in the future on behalf of some other 16 yr old out there that you consider what you place on the Internet for something which lasts for eternity.
The reason my column was so vindictive is that whenever I write about Parade magazine, I say vindictive things. Particularly about Personality Parade, which I find intensely frightening. The question you asked -- REDACTED TO PROTECT THE GUILTY -- struck me as particularly infuriating because, well, it's just plain silly. I can't imagine the process by which someone would ponder this and then send in a question to Parade about it, so perhaps you can illuminate that process for me as well. But the name I called you I call everyone who writes into Personality Parade -- it wasn't specific to you. Shoot, I even have t-shirts. At any rate, when you put something into the public sphere, as you do when you write a letter to the editor, or a letter to Parade, and it is published you have to expect that people will react to your opinions or questions, positively or negatively, and often in print. Mockery and satire are part of our culture and society and what I do with Parade, and with your question, is just that.










Recent Comments